Martin v. McIntosh et al

Filing 30

ORDER Adopting 27 Report and Recommendation and Terminating as moot, 10 Motion to Dismiss filed by McIntosh, Robert Pickell and Dismissing the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANIEL MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO: 16-CV-13090-DT

MCINTOSH, ET AL.,
Defendants.

/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Stephanie Dawkins Davis
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her report filed on April 21,
2017, the magistrate judge recommended that this court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and that the pending motion to dismiss
[Dkt #10] be terminated as moot. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this
Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt #10] is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 26, 2017

1

The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or
pro se parties on this date, May 26, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

2