John Doe v. Snyder et al
Filing
109
ORDER GRANTING 108 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 107 Amended MOTION for Judgment filed by COL. KRISTE ETUE, Richard Snyder, :( Response due by 2/26/2021, Reply due by 3/8/2021) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Case 2:16-cv-13137-RHC-DRG ECF No. 109, PageID.2166 Filed 02/19/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DOE, et al.,
v.
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 16-13137
RICHARD SNYDER, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE A RESPONSE
The court held a telephonic conference with counsel on February 16, 2021 to
determine the status of the case and to discuss Defendants’ outstanding motion, (ECF
No. 108), for an extension of time to file responsive briefing. During the conference, the
parties indicated that they had come to a mutual agreement on a new briefing schedule
for Plaintiffs’ “Amended Motion for Judgment.” (ECF No. 107). Therefore, the court will
grant Defendants’ motion (ECF No. 107). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion for Extension of Time to File
Response/Reply” (ECF No. 108) is GRANTED.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ “Amended MOTION for
Judgment” is due by February 26, 2021.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ reply brief is due by March 8, 2021.
Dated: February 19, 2021
s/Robert H. Cleland
/
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:16-cv-13137-RHC-DRG ECF No. 109, PageID.2167 Filed 02/19/21 Page 2 of 2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, February 19, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(810) 292-6522
S:\Cleland\Cleland\AAB\Opinions and Orders\Civil\16-13137.DOESII.order.setting resp deadline.AAB.docx
2
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?