Kar Nut Products Company v. Red River Commodies, Inc.
Filing
44
ORDER (1) Granting Third-Party Defendants' 20 and 27 Motions to Dismiss; and (2) Dismissing Defendant Red River Commodities' 11 Third-Party Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KAR NUT PRODUCTS COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 16-cv-13197
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
RED RIVER COMMODITIES,
Defendant.
RED RIVER COMMODITIES,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
TRAVIS & SHEILA KAY MIRES JV
And GD & BRUCE VAUGHN,
Third-Party Defendants
_________________________________/
ORDER (1) GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS (ECF ## 20, 27); AND (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANT RED
RIVER COMMODITIES’ THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (ECF #11)
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
On December 22, 2016, Defendant Red River Commodities filed a thirdparty complaint against (1) Travis & Sheila Kay Mires JV (the “Mires JV”); and
(2) GD & Bruce Vaughn (the “Vaughns”). (See ECF #11.)
On February 22, 2017 and March 17, 2017 respectively, the Vaughns and
the Mires JV moved to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of personal
1
jurisdiction or in the alternative to transfer venue to the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Motions”). (See ECF ## 20, 27.)
The Court held a hearing on the Motions on June 26, 2017.
For the reasons stated on the record at the June 26, 2017 hearing, the
Motions (ECF ## 20, 27) are GRANTED. Red River Commodities’ third party
complaint (ECF #11) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
personal jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 5, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on July 5, 2017, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?