Alexander v. Calzetta et al
Filing
90
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and GRANTING Plaintiff's 87 MOTION for Leave to File filed by D'Andre Alexander., ( Defendant's Response due by 3/2/2018, Plaintiff's Reply due 3/23/2018)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
D’ANDRE ALEXANDER
# 731077,
Plaintiff
Case No. 2:16-CV-13293
District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
v.
NICHOLAS GALZETTA,
FRED GOVERN, ERICA
HUSS, DARRIN VIITALA,
MANDI SALMI, KENNETH
NIEMISTO, KRISTINE
GIESEN, TERRY MEDEN,
CHAD LaCOUNT, HANNA
SAAD, DR. ROSEN, C/O
WATKINS, C/O LEWIS, C/O
LEE, C/O SLAUGHTER, C/O
HOUSTON, DAPHNE M.
JOHNSON and RICHARD
IDEMUDIA
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION (DE 87) AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
On January 31, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a dispositive
motion, attaching his proposed motion for summary judgment. (DE 87.) Leave is
not required to file a motion for summary judgment, as a scheduling order has not
been entered in this case setting forth a deadline for dispositive motions.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is granted, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment will be recognized as DE 87 at 2-23, with Exhibits 1-26 attached.
Defendants shall file any response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment no
later than March 2, 2018, and Plaintiff shall file any reply no later than March 23,
2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2018
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on February 6, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?