Alexander v. Calzetta et al

Filing 90

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and GRANTING Plaintiff's 87 MOTION for Leave to File filed by D'Andre Alexander., ( Defendant's Response due by 3/2/2018, Plaintiff's Reply due 3/23/2018)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION D’ANDRE ALEXANDER # 731077, Plaintiff Case No. 2:16-CV-13293 District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. NICHOLAS GALZETTA, FRED GOVERN, ERICA HUSS, DARRIN VIITALA, MANDI SALMI, KENNETH NIEMISTO, KRISTINE GIESEN, TERRY MEDEN, CHAD LaCOUNT, HANNA SAAD, DR. ROSEN, C/O WATKINS, C/O LEWIS, C/O LEE, C/O SLAUGHTER, C/O HOUSTON, DAPHNE M. JOHNSON and RICHARD IDEMUDIA Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION (DE 87) AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE On January 31, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a dispositive motion, attaching his proposed motion for summary judgment. (DE 87.) Leave is not required to file a motion for summary judgment, as a scheduling order has not been entered in this case setting forth a deadline for dispositive motions. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is granted, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be recognized as DE 87 at 2-23, with Exhibits 1-26 attached. Defendants shall file any response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment no later than March 2, 2018, and Plaintiff shall file any reply no later than March 23, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2018 s/Anthony P. Patti Anthony P. Patti UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on February 6, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?