Hammis v. Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER ACCEPTEDING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDTION (#17) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#14) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#15). Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEBRA ANN HAMMIS, Case No. 16-cv-13416 Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTEDING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDTION (#17) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#14) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#15) This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment as to judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision disallowing benefits to Plaintiff. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis, who issued a Report and Recommendation on August 18, 2017, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review of the parties’ briefing and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate -1- Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Davis’s August 18, 2017 Report and Recommendation [#17] as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2017 s/Gershwin A. Drain HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN United States District Court Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?