Scott v. Lamb et al
Filing
27
ORDER Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Barry Lamb, M. Rourke Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (CMul)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 16-CV-13462
vs.
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
BARRY LAMB and
MARK ROARK,
Defendants.
_________________/
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This matter is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary
judgment [docket entry 26]. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti has submitted a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommends that the motion be granted in part and denied
in part. No party has filed objections to the R&R and the objection period has expired. Having
reviewed the amended complaint, the motion papers, and the R&R, the Court agrees with the
magistrate judge’s analysis and recommendation. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Patti’s June 29, 2017, R&R is hereby
accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment is
granted in part and denied in part as follows: The motion is granted as to all claims against
defendant Roark and as to the access-to-courts claim against defendant Lamb; the motion is denied
as to the retaliation claims against defendant Lamb.
S/ Bernard A. Friedman_________
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 18, 2017
Detroit, Michigan
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any
unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective e-mail or First Class U.S. Mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on James Scott, #124522
s/Carol L. Mullins
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?