Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company
ORDER Requiring Ford Motor Company to Respond to Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for Reconsideration. (Response due by 2/17/2017) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
ARABIAN MOTORS GROUP W.L.L.,
Case No. 16-cv-13655
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
ORDER REQUIRING FORD MOTOR COMPANY TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF #21)
On February 2, 2017, Plaintiff Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. filed a Motion
for Reconsideration of the Court's Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion
Reconsideration”). (ECF #21.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ford
Motor Company shall respond to the Motion for Reconsideration by not later than
February 17, 2017.
On pages 8-9 of the Motion for Reconsideration (Pg. ID 683-84), Plaintiff
cites and applies two canons of statutory construction (the “Canons”). In Ford’s
response, Ford shall address (1) whether Plaintiff has previously cited and/or
presented arguments based upon the Canons, (2) if Plaintiff has not done so,
whether Plaintiff’s arguments concerning the Canons are properly presented to the
Court in the Motion for Reconsideration, and (3) assuming that Plaintiff’s
arguments concerning the Canons are properly before the Court, whether the
correct application of the Canons requires the Court to reach a different result on
the underlying motion for preliminary injunction. Ford may also address any other
arguments raised in the Motion for Reconsideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2017
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on February 3, 2017, by electronic means and/or
s/Holly A. Monda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?