Brown v. Supps et al
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration re 11 Objection filed by Antrell V. Brown. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
ANTRELL V. BROWN, #367927,
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-13725
HONORABLE GERALD E. ROSEN
D. SUPPES, et al.,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “objection” to the Court’s
dismissal of his pro se civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The Court dismissed the complaint, which consisted of more than 800 pages of handwritten allegations, grievance forms, state court documents, and other exhibits, with
prejudice as to attorney Jonathan B.D. Simon because he is not a person subject to
suit under § 1983 and without prejudice as to the remaining allegations/defendants
for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). Plaintiff now
objects to the Court’s decision accusing the Court of malfeasance, dereliction of duty,
Plaintiff’s objection/motion must be denied. A request for reconsideration
which presents issues already ruled upon by the Court, either expressly or by
reasonable implication, will not be granted. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547,
550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952
(E.D. Mich. 1997). Plaintiff raises such issues in his motion. The Court properly
dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. Moreover, the Court did
not act unethically or with improper intent. Plaintiff has not met his burden of
showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled or his burden of
showing that a different disposition must result from a correction thereof, as required
by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3).
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s
objection/motion. This case is closed. No further pleadings should be filed in this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
United States District Judge
Dated: January 9, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on January 9, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Case Manager, (313) 234-5135
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?