Juide v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 49

ORDER Adopting 48 Report and Recommendation for Granting 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Corizon Health, Inc. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Mack Juide, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-13806 Michigan Department of Corrections, et al., Sean F. Cox United States District Court Judge Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING 10/24/17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Acting pro se, Plaintiff Mack Juide filed this action against nine different Defendants. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti for all pretrial proceedings. On October 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Patti issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Docket Entry No. 48) wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Corizon Health, Inc.’s unopposed Motion to Dismiss. The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the October 24, 2017 R&R and ORDERS that all claims against Defendant Corizon Health, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: November 27, 2017 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Mack Juide, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-13806 Michigan Department of Corrections, et al., Sean F. Cox United States District Court Judge Defendants. ______________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 27, 2017, the foregoing document was served on counsel of record via electronic means and upon Mack Juide via First Class mail at the address below: Mack Juide 441625 OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 1500 CABERFAE HIGHWAY MANISTEE, MI 49660 s/J. McCoy Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?