Juide v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Filing
49
ORDER Adopting 48 Report and Recommendation for Granting 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Corizon Health, Inc. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mack Juide,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-13806
Michigan Department of Corrections,
et al.,
Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
10/24/17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Acting pro se, Plaintiff Mack Juide filed this action against nine different Defendants.
The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti for all pretrial proceedings.
On October 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Patti issued a Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) (Docket Entry No. 48) wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Corizon
Health, Inc.’s unopposed Motion to Dismiss.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that no
objections have been filed.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the October 24, 2017 R&R and ORDERS that
all claims against Defendant Corizon Health, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: November 27, 2017
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mack Juide,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-13806
Michigan Department of Corrections,
et al.,
Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
Defendants.
______________________________/
PROOF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on November 27, 2017, the foregoing document was served on
counsel of record via electronic means and upon Mack Juide via First Class mail at the address
below:
Mack Juide
441625
OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
1500 CABERFAE HIGHWAY
MANISTEE, MI 49660
s/J. McCoy
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?