Juide v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED 50 Motion to Take Deposition--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MACK JUIDE #441625,
Plaintiff
v.
Case No. 2:16-CV-13806
District Judge Sean F. Cox
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL
KLEE, WILLIS CHAPMAN,
RICHARD WHITE, DAVE
MARTIN, JERRY TANNER,
and ROBIN DONAGHY,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO DEPOSE PRISONER (DE 50)
Pending is Defendants’ December 1, 2017 motion to depose pro se Plaintiff.
(DE 50.) Permission of the Court to take the deposition is required under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B) because Plaintiff is incarcerated. Plaintiff has not responded to
the motion and the time for doing so under LR 7.1 has expired. The motion
therefore may be granted as unopposed.
Thus, upon the reading and filing of Defendants’ Motion for Leave to
Depose Prisoner pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), and
otherwise, being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Depose Prisoner (DE 50) is GRANTED AS
UNOPPOSED, and Defendants shall be permitted to take the deposition of the
Plaintiff for all purposes allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The
deposition may occur either in person, by telephone, or via video teleconference, at
Defendants’ option and consistent with the requirements and needs of Plaintiff’s
place of incarceration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 26, 2017
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on December 26, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?