Juide v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Filing
70
ORDER Adopting 67 Report and Recommendation for Granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by J. Tanner, R. White, Paul D. Klee, Michigan Department of Corrections, Willie Chapman, D. Martin, R. Donaghy and Denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Mack Juide. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (BGar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mack Juide,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-13806
Michigan Department of Corrections,
et al.,
Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
12/26/18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Acting pro se, Plaintiff Mack Juide filed this action against nine different Defendants.
The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti for all pretrial proceedings.
Two Defendants, the Kone Company and Corizon Health, Inc., have since been
dismissed from this action. The Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), and six of its
employees (Klee, Chapman, White, Martin, Tanner, and Donaghy), (collectively “the MDOC
Defendants”) remain in this action.
On December 26, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) wherein he recommends that this Court: 1) deny Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion
(ECF No. 58); and 2) grant the MDOC Defendants’ summary judgment. (ECF No. 59).
On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an extension of time for filing
objections to that R&R. This Court granted that motion to the extent that the Court ordered that
Plaintiff shall file any objections to the December 26, 2018 R&R no later than February 8, 2019.
1
(ECF No. 69). Nevertheless, Plaintiff has not filed any objections.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the magistrate judge’s R&R dated December 26,
2018 is ADOPTED. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is
DENIED and the summary judgment motion filed by the MDOC Defendants is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: February 27, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?