Old Republic Insurance Company et al v. Aristeo Construction Company
Filing
34
ORDER (1) Denying Defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Denying Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CO.,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 16-cv-13826
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
ARISTEO CONSTRUCTION CO.,
Defendant.
_______________________________________________________________________/
ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF #23) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (ECF #25)
This is an insurance coverage and contractual dispute.
On March 1, 2018,
Defendant Aristeo Construction Company (“Aristeo”) filed a motion for summary
judgment. (See ECF #23.) On that same day, Plaintiffs Old Republic Insurance Company
and Konematic, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (See
ECF #25.) The Court held a hearing on the motions on June 20, 2018.
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Aristeo’s motion for summary
judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 20, 2018
1
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on June 20, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(810) 341-9764
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?