Old Republic Insurance Company et al v. Aristeo Construction Company

Filing 34

ORDER (1) Denying Defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Denying Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CO., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 16-cv-13826 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. ARISTEO CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #23) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #25) This is an insurance coverage and contractual dispute. On March 1, 2018, Defendant Aristeo Construction Company (“Aristeo”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (See ECF #23.) On that same day, Plaintiffs Old Republic Insurance Company and Konematic, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (See ECF #25.) The Court held a hearing on the motions on June 20, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Aristeo’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.             s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 20, 2018 1   I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on June 20, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?