United States of America v. Howard
Filing
4
ORDER Granting 1 Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
Misc. No. 16-mc-50330
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
-vsALLAN R. HOWARD,
Respondent.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO ENFORCE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
Petitioner having applied for an order to enforce an Internal Revenue Service
Summons relating to the investigation into the tax liabilities of Allan R. Howard
for the Form 1040 for the calendar years ending December 31, 2012, December 31,
2013, and December 31, 2014; and the petition and order having been personally
served upon Allan R. Howard on March 7, 2016; this cause having come before
the undersigned pursuant to the Order to Show Cause issued March 3, 2016, and
due deliberation having been had herein;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue
Service Summons is GRANTED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent, Allan R. Howard,
appear before Revenue Officer Deborah Black or her designated representative at
10:00 a.m. on May 18, 2016, at 22600 Hall Road, Suite 102, Clinton Twp.,
Michigan, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and to produce for
examination and copying the books, records, papers and other data demanded by
the summons served upon Allan R. Howard on October 27, 2015, the examination
to continue from day to day until completed.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 18, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on April 18, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary
mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?