Dye v. Hatton et al

Filing 27

ORDER Accepting Magistrate Judge's 24 Report and Recommendation, and Denying Plaintiff's 21 , 22 Motions for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY DYE, 302488, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 17-CV-10183 HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN J. HATTON and L. GIDLEY, Defendants. ________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF=S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiff=s motion for a clerk=s default and for a default judgment [docket entries 21 and 22]. Magistrate Judge Whalen has issued a Report and Recommendation (AR&R@) in which he recommends that both motions be denied. Plaintiff has filed a pro forma objection but does not address the magistrate judge=s reasoning, namely, that Congress has eliminated default as a remedy in prisoner cases. See 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e(g). Further, as the magistrate judge noted, defendants have recently responded to the complaint by filing a motion for summary judgment, thereby mooting the issue raised in plaintiff=s motions for default. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Whalen=s R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff=s motion for a clerk=s default and for a default judgment [docket entries 21 and 22] are denied. Dated: July 2, 2018 Detroit, Michigan s/Bernard A. Friedman BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on July 2, 2018. s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?