Harris v. Yum! Brands, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting 34 Motion To compel Discovery Responses to Include Signed Authorizations.. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHERYL HARRIS, Plaintiff, Case No.: 17-10239 Honorable Gershwin A. Drain v. YUM! BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES TO INCLUDE SIGNED AUTHORIZATIONS [#34] On April 25, 2018, Defendants Redberry Resto Brands International, Inc. and Redberry Resto-Brands, Inc. filed a Motion to Compel Discovery Responses to Include Signed Authorizations, filed on April 25, 2018. Plaintiff Cheryl Harris has failed to file a Response to the present motion, which was due on or before May 14, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6; E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(e). Thus, Defendants’ present motion is uncontested. This is the second time Defendants have been forced to seek court intervention to obtain the signed authorizations from Plaintiff, which they originally requested in March of 2017. In fact, on February 6, 2018, the Court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to produce signed authorizations within seven (7) days from the date the order was entered. See Dkt. No. 26. Here, the Court finds that good cause exists for granting Defendants’ requested relief. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses to Include Signed Authorizations [#34] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall produce the signed authorizations no later than July 27, 2018. Failure to produce the signed authorizations may result in the imposition of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this lawsuit. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 20, 2018 /s/Gershwin A. Drain GERSHWIN A. DRAIN United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on July 20, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. /s/ Tanya Bankston Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?