Farnsworth v. Purdy et al

Filing 10

ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRANDON JAMES FARNSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-10726 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman S. PURDY and M. FLOYD, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF #9) On May 18, 2017, Plaintiff Brandon Farnsworth filed a motion for the appointment of counsel in this prisoner civil-rights action. (See ECF #9.) However, this case is closed. On May 11, 2017, the Court dismissed Farnsworth’s Complaint by written order and entered a judgment in favor of the Defendants. (See ECF ## 7, 8.) Accordingly, because Farnsworth’s motion to appoint counsel is moot, the motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 31, 2017 1 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 31, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (313) 234-5113 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?