Farnsworth v. Purdy et al

Filing 10

ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRANDON JAMES
FARNSWORTH,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 17-cv-10726
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

S. PURDY and M. FLOYD,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF #9)
On May 18, 2017, Plaintiff Brandon Farnsworth filed a motion for the
appointment of counsel in this prisoner civil-rights action. (See ECF #9.) However,
this case is closed. On May 11, 2017, the Court dismissed Farnsworth’s Complaint
by written order and entered a judgment in favor of the Defendants. (See ECF ## 7,
8.) Accordingly, because Farnsworth’s motion to appoint counsel is moot, the
motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 31, 2017
1

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on May 31, 2017, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
[phone]

2