Glenn v. Corizon Medical, Inc.
ORDER to Provide the Correct Address for Defendant Corizon--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 2:17-cv-10972
District Judge George Caram Steeh
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
CORIZON MEDICAL INC.,
ORDER TO PROVIDE THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT
Plaintiff, Myron Glenn, a state prisoner who is proceeding without the
assistance of counsel, filed his complaint and application to proceed without
prepayment of fees on March 27, 2017. (DE 1, 2.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s
application on March 29, 2017 and directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve
Defendant, Corizon Medical Inc. (“Corizon”), without prepayment of costs. (DE
4-5.) Plaintiff provided the following address for service upon Corizon: 105
Westpark Drive, Suite #200, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027. This case was referred
to me for all pretrial matters on April 3, 2017, pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(a)
and (b). (DE 7.)
On May 5, 2017, the service documents were returned unexecuted as to
Corizon. The letter from Janeice Edwards of the U.S. Marshals Service indicated
that process was returned by the U.S. Post Office as “Unable to Forward.” (DE 8.)
Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to provide the Court with the correct address for
Corizon so that service can again be attempted. Plaintiff is to provide the
information to the Court in writing ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 2017.
Thereafter, the U.S. Marshals Service SHALL re-attempt service of the summons
and complaint upon Corizon in the address provided by Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2017
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on May 30, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?