Norris v. BERRYHILL

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NANCY A BERRYHILL, and DENYING 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Andy J. Norris Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDY J. NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 17-CV-11051-DT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued her report on February 20, 2018 recommending that this court deny plaintiff=s motion for summary judgment, and grant defendant=s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1 Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order. 1 The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff=s motion for summary judgment [#14] is DENIED, Defendant=s motion for summary judgment [#17] is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 13, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, March 13, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?