Buck v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
ORDER Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice re 1 Notice of Removal. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
BECKY JO BUCK,
Case No. 17-cv-11151
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT (ECF #1)
On October 10, 2017, the Court entered an order terminating the appearance
of Plaintiff Becky Jo Buck’s counsel in this action. (See ECF #6.) The order set a
deadline of November 2, 2017 for Plaintiff to (1) have new counsel enter an
appearance or (2) inform the Court that she would represent herself or, alternatively,
had decided not proceed with the action. The order specified that failure to comply
could result in dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint:
(2) By not later than November 2, 2017, Plaintiff Becky
Jo Buck shall; (a) have new counsel file an appearance on
her behalf; (b) inform the Court that she will represent
herself; or (c) notify the court if she determines not to
proceed with this action. If Plaintiff chooses to represent
herself or not to proceed with this action, she shall inform
the Clerk of the Court by letter to 231 W. Lafayette Blvd.,
Detroit, MI 48226.
(3) Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with
paragraph (2) above may result in dismissal of this action.
(Id. at Pg. ID 297.)
At the time of this Order, no new counsel for Plaintiff has filed an appearance,
and Plaintiff has not informed the Court that she will represent herself or that she
has decided not to proceed with the action.
Accordingly, the Complaint (ECF #1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 14, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on November 14, 2017, by electronic means and/or
s/Holly A. Monda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?