Nankervis v. Goebel et al
Filing
34
ORDER Granting Defendants Mendoza, Parra, Colon and Hopkins's 30 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Proposed Expert Witnesses. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KELLY NANKERVIS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-cv-11175
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
MATT GOEBEL, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MENDOZA, PARRA,
COLÓN AND HOPKINS’S MOTION TO STRIKE
PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES
On September 28, 2018, Defendants Benito Mendoza, Alejandro Parra, Jesús
Colón, and Chadwick Hopkins filed a motion to strike Plaintiff’s proposed expert
witnesses. (See ECF #30.) In their motion, Defendants seek to preclude Plaintiff
from calling three expert witnesses for whom Plaintiff failed to provide written
expert reports. (Id. at Pg. ID 552-53.)
On October 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendants’ motion. In it,
she stated that “she will not be calling” the three expert witnesses in question. (See
ECF #33 at Pg. ID 834.)
1
Because Plaintiff does not plan to call the expert witnesses who are the subject
of the Defendants’ motion, the Court GRANTS the motion to strike Plaintiff’s
proposed expert witnesses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 15, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on October 15, 2018, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(810) 341-9764
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?