Nankervis v. Goebel et al

Filing 34

ORDER Granting Defendants Mendoza, Parra, Colon and Hopkins's 30 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Proposed Expert Witnesses. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KELLY NANKERVIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-cv-11175 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. MATT GOEBEL, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MENDOZA, PARRA, COLÓN AND HOPKINS’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES On September 28, 2018, Defendants Benito Mendoza, Alejandro Parra, Jesús Colón, and Chadwick Hopkins filed a motion to strike Plaintiff’s proposed expert witnesses. (See ECF #30.) In their motion, Defendants seek to preclude Plaintiff from calling three expert witnesses for whom Plaintiff failed to provide written expert reports. (Id. at Pg. ID 552-53.) On October 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendants’ motion. In it, she stated that “she will not be calling” the three expert witnesses in question. (See ECF #33 at Pg. ID 834.) 1   Because Plaintiff does not plan to call the expert witnesses who are the subject of the Defendants’ motion, the Court GRANTS the motion to strike Plaintiff’s proposed expert witnesses. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 15, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 15, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?