Weatherspoon v. Dinsa et al

Filing 62

ORDER (1)Accepting and the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge Dated August 3, 2018 (DKT. 59 and 60 ), (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Injunctions (DKT. 39 ), (3) Denying Plaintiff's Second Motion to Enforce Injunctions (DKT. 48 ), (4) Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (DKT. 42 ), and (5) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery (DKT. 54 ) and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (DKT. 58 ) as Moot. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON,
Plaintiff,

Civil Action No.
17-cv-11196

vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
SURJIT DINSA, et al.
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED AUGUST 3, 2018
(DKT. 59 AND 60), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE
INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 39), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO
ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 48), (4) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 42), AND (5) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (DKT. 54) AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY
HEARING (DKT. 58) AS MOOT
This matter is presently before the Court on the Reports and Recommendations
(R&R) of Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, issued on August 3, 2018. In the first R&R,
the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 42) by
Defendants Potts, Horgan (a/k/a Lilley Conrad), Collier, Stanifer, Holman, Spirko, Deland,
Kline, Stamman, Chamberlain, Brown, Wallerstein, Okete, and Klee, and recommends that
the Court sua sponte dismiss Defendants Dinsa, Kornowski, McGuire, King, Pomery, and
Parke with prejudice.

In the second R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying

Plaintiff’s motions seeking injunctive relief (Dkts. 39 and 48). The parties have not filed
objections to the R&Rs, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The
Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the proper
conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&Rs are accepted and adopted as the
findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 42) by
Defendants Potts, Horgan (a/k/a Lilley Conrad), Collier, Stanifer, Holman, Spirko, Deland,
Kline, Stamman, Chamberlain, Brown, Wallerstein, Okete, and Klee is GRANTED and they
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED sua sponte Defendants Dinsa, Kornowski, McGuire, King,
Pomery, and Parke are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to enforce injunctions (Dkts. 39 and
48) are DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for discovery (dkt. 54) and motion for
an evidentiary hearing (dkt. 58) are DENIED as moot
SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2018
Detroit, Michigan

s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and
any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on August 28, 2018.
s/Karri Sandusky
Case Manager

2