Bonner v. Prison Transportation Services Corporation et al

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING 68 Report and Recommendation, TERMINATING as MOOT 64 Motion to Dismiss filed by Prison Transportation Services Corporation and Dismissing the Complaint with Prejudice Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIAN BONNER, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 17-CV-11571 PRISON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC AND JOHN DOE Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Stephanie Dawkins Davis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her report filed on August 27, 2019, the magistrate judge recommended that this court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the defendant Prison Transportation Services’ motion to dismiss be denied or terminated as moot. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1 The court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation for purposes of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation”, Defendant Prison Transportation Services’ Motion to Dismiss [#64] is TERMINATED AS MOOT and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 1 Dated: September 20, 2019 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, September 20, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522 . 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?