Fields v. Ashford et al

Filing 80

ORDER (1) Denying Defendant's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment Without Prejudice and (2) Permitting Defendant to File Daubert Motion to Challenge Plaintiff's Expert Gary J. McDonald. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANGELA J. FIELDS, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-cv-11812 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. PIERRE OCTAVIUS ASHFORD, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #71) WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND (2) PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO FILE DAUBERT MOTION TO CHALLENGE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT GARY J. McDONALD On June 5, 2019, the Court held a hearing on Defendant Pierre Octavius Ashford’s motion for summary judgment. (See Mot., ECF #71.) For the reasons explained on the record, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As further explained on the record, the Court will permit Ashford to file a motion challenging the admissibility of Plaintiff’s expert, Gary J. McDonald, under the standards described in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Ashford shall file that motion no later than June 26, 2019. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion by no later than July 17, 2019. Ashford may file a reply 1   by no later than July 24, 2019. After the Court rules on the Daubert motion, it will allow Ashford to renew his motion for summary judgment at that time. IT IS SO ORDERED.           s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE   Dated: June 5, 2019 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on June 5, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/ Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764       2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?