Watson v. City of Burton, a Michigan municipal corporation et al
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 43 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
MICHAEL CLIFTON WATSON,
District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
CITY OF BURTON, ET AL.,
For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on November 30, 2017,
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Authorizations [Doc. #43] is GRANTED.
Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must give Defendants’
counsel a signed authorization for all his treatment records, including psychiatric,
psychological, counseling, and medical records, from the Veterans Affairs Outpatient
Clinic or any clinic or facility where he received treatment or counseling through the
Veterans Affairs Association, from 2012 to the present.
The providers covered by this Order may redact any information that would be
considered classified (i.e., information the government has deemed “top secret,” “secret,”
or “confidential”) under Executive Order 13526.
The treatment and counseling information disclosed to Defendants is subject to a
“attorneys’ eyes only” protective order, and will be disclosed only to Defendants’
attorneys and experts, absent further order of this Court. It will not be disclosed to any of
the Defendants or to anyone other that Defendants’ attorneys and experts. If any of this
material is referenced or included in any motion or other Court filing, such documents
will be filed under seal, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ R. Steven Whalen
R. STEVEN WHALEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: December 4, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on December 4, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.
s/Carolyn M. Ciesla
Case Manager to the
Honorable R. Steven Whalen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?