Bremer v. Corizon Health Care Incorporated, et al
Filing
41
ORDER (1) Accepting and Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Dated December 21, 2017 (Dkt. 40 ) and (2) Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. 18 , 19 ). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JACOB BREMER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-cv-11865
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
CORIZON HEALTH CARE, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER
(1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED DECEMBER 21, 2017 (Dkt. 40) AND (2)
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkts. 18, 19)
This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis, issued on December 21, 2017 (Dkt. 40). In the R&R,
the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Dkts. 18, 19) be granted.
The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has
reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&R is accepted and adopted
as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court grants Defendants’ motions
to dismiss. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 29, 2018
Detroit, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any
unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail
addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 29, 2018.
s/Karri Sandusky
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?