Mullins v. Berryhill
Filing
27
ORDER granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 26 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DEANNA MARIE MULLINS,
Case No. 17-12180
Plaintiff,
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. STEVEN WHALEN
Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [26]; GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17]; DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22]; AND REMANDING CASE
On July 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) [26] on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [17]
and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [22]. The R&R recommended
that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand the case for further fact-finding.
Neither party has filed any objection to the R&R.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [26] is hereby ADOPTED
and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly,
Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [17] is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [22] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to the
Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R&R.
THIS CASE IS CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 22, 2018
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?