Mullins v. Berryhill

Filing 27

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 26 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEANNA MARIE MULLINS, Case No. 17-12180 Plaintiff, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [26]; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17]; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22]; AND REMANDING CASE On July 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [26] on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [17] and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [22]. The R&R recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand the case for further fact-finding. Neither party has filed any objection to the R&R. The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [26] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Page 1 of 2 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [17] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [22] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R&R. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 22, 2018 s/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow Senior United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?