Tate v. Capital Bank
Filing
11
ORDER Accepting Magistrate Judge Patti's 10 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LARRY TATE,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 17-CV-12221
vs.
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
CAPITAL BANK,
Defendant.
________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s complaint [docket entry 1]. Plaintiff
filed the instant complaint in July 2017 but did not serve defendant. So in December, Magistrate
Judge Patti ordered plaintiff to show cause by January 22 why the case should not be dismissed
for plaintiff’s failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff has still not answered that
order to show cause. Therefore, Magistrate Judge Patti’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”)
recommends that the Court dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Rule 4(m) [docket
entry 10].
Having reviewed the docket, plaintiff’s complaint, and the R & R, the Court agrees
with the R & R. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the R & R is accepted and adopted as the findings and
conclusions of this Court, and the case is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4.
Dated: April 16, 2018
Detroit, Michigan
s/Bernard A. Friedman
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and
any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on April 16, 2018.
s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?