Kaye Financial Corporation v. Ticor Title Agency of Arizona, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVSION KAYE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. 2:17-CV-12427-TGB ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. 15) TICOR TITLE AGENCY OF ARIZONA, INC., FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, LLC, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ second motion to dismiss (Dkt. 15). Plaintiff filed a response (Dkt. 17) and Defendant filed a reply (Dkt. 19). The Court held a hearing on Defendants’ motion on September 17, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record during the hearing, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Plaintiff's breach of contract indemnification claim (Count 1) can proceed, as it is not time barred. Plaintiff's tort related claims (Counts 2 through 6) are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants’ argument regarding dismissing the allegedly improperly named defendant, Fidelity National Title Company, and argument to change the name of Ticor Title Agency of Arizona Inc. are denied without prejudice. Defendants may renew those arguments at the conclusion of discovery, but the Court encourages the parties to reach a mutual agreement on the correct names of the defendants. Finally, Plaintiff’s claim to recover attorney’s fees is dismissed. SO ORDERED. DATED this 4th day of June, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 29, 2018 2 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on October 29, 2018, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?