Anderson v. Furst et al
Filing
50
ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's re 46 Objection filed by Jerry Anderson, 45 Objection filed by Jerry Anderson. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JERRY ANDERSON
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-12676
v.
Honorable Victoria A. Roberts
COLTER FURST, et al.,
Defendant.
_________________________________/
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS [DOC. 45 AND 46] TO COURT’S
ORDERS
Jerry Anderson (“Anderson”) is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis. He
filed a civil rights lawsuit against Michigan State Police Troopers Colter Furst, Michael
Thomas, and Nathan Ellis (collectively, “Defendants”). Anderson alleges that
Defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights by using excessive force during his
arrest.
Anderson objected to the Court’s April 20, 2018 order dismissing previous
objections he filed to two non-dispositive orders from Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti.
[Doc. # 37]. The Court construed his objections as a motion for reconsideration, which
were denied on June 13, 2018. [Doc. #41].
Similarly, Anderson objected to Magistrate Judge Patti’s April 23, 2018 order
denying as moot his motion compelling discovery. [Doc. # 38]. The Court also construed
those objections as a motion for reconsideration; they were denied on June 13, 2018.
[Doc. # 42].
1
Again, Anderson has filed objections, this time to the Court’s June 13, 2018
orders dismissing his motions for reconsideration. The Court has already determined
that, in both motions, Anderson failed to show a palpable defect by which the Court was
misled.
The Court will not grant Anderson another chance to litigate issues that it has
already ruled on. Anderson’s objections are DENIED.
IT IS ORDERED.
S/Victoria A. Roberts
Victoria A. Roberts
United States District Judge
Dated: July 16, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?