Craft et al v. Billingslea et al

Filing 58

ORDER RESCINDING ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 55 AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES 54 . Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION D’MARCO CRAFT AND MICHAELE JACKSON, Case No. 17-cv-12752 Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN v. RICHARD BILLINGSLEA ET AL., Defendants. __________________________/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB ORDER RESCINDING ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE [55] AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES [54] On December 21, 2017, the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office criminally charged Defendant Richard Billingslea for actions alleged in this case.1 The Court, therefore, stayed this case on March 21, 2018. Dkt. No. 57. On March 20, 2018, one day before the Court stayed the case, Plaintiffs moved to compel supplemental discovery responses and the Court referred this motion to United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. See Dkt. Nos. 54, 55. The Court will RESCIND the Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Majzoub [55]. And, as the case is stayed, the Court will DENY Plaintiffs’ 1 See Allie Gross, Two Detroit Police Officers Arraigned in Excessive Force Cases, DETROIT FREE PRESS, Dec. 21, 2017, available at https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2017/12/21/detroitpolice-excessive-force/973551001/ Motion to Compel Supplemental Discovery Responses WITHOUT PREJUDICE [54]. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 21, 2018 /s/Gershwin A. Drain GERSHWIN A. DRAIN United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on May 21, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. /s/ Tanya Bankston Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?