Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 18 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL MILLER,
Case No. 17-12756
Plaintiff,
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS
Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18]; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16]
Plaintiff Michael Miller seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law
Judge’s decision denying his claim for Supplemental Security Income Benefits.
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [15] on January 16, 2018.
Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [16] on February 13, 2018.
Plaintiff filed a Reply [17] on March 1, 2018.
On September 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report &
Recommendation [18] (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s
Motion [15] and grant Defendant’s Motion [16]. Neither party has filed any
objection to the R&R.
Page 1 of 2
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [18] is hereby ADOPTED
and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [15] is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [16] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 28, 2018
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?