Bachir v. Suburban Employee Services, LLC et al

Filing 20

ORDER striking 19 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _____________________________________________________________________ ADAM BACHIR Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-13323 SUBURBAN COLLECTION IMPORTED CARS, LLC, d/b/a SUBURBAN ACURA Defendant. __________________________________/ ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Having received and reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #19), the court has noted that the motion is out of compliance with the formatting requirements imposed in the court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. #6 Pg. ID 33–34). Specifically, it lacks a numbered “Statement of Material Facts” with citations to the record, to which the non-moving party is obligated to respond fact-by-fact. Defendant’s narrative statements of purported facts are insufficiently specific to meet the requirements of the Scheduling Order. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #19) is STRICKEN and Defendant is directed to review and properly format for resubmission any such intended motion without delay. Plaintiff’s deadline for response will not start until such resubmission. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 27, 2018 / I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, June 27, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522 Z:\Cleland\KNP\Civil\17-13323.BACHIR.Strike.Motion.Formatting.RHC.KNP.docx 2 /

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?