Bachir v. Suburban Employee Services, LLC et al
Filing
20
ORDER striking 19 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
_____________________________________________________________________
ADAM BACHIR
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-13323
SUBURBAN COLLECTION IMPORTED
CARS, LLC, d/b/a SUBURBAN ACURA
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Having received and reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.
#19), the court has noted that the motion is out of compliance with the formatting
requirements imposed in the court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. #6 Pg. ID 33–34).
Specifically, it lacks a numbered “Statement of Material Facts” with citations to the
record, to which the non-moving party is obligated to respond fact-by-fact. Defendant’s
narrative statements of purported facts are insufficiently specific to meet the
requirements of the Scheduling Order.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #19) is
STRICKEN and Defendant is directed to review and properly format for resubmission
any such intended motion without delay. Plaintiff’s deadline for response will not start
until such resubmission.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 27, 2018
/
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, June 27, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(810) 292-6522
Z:\Cleland\KNP\Civil\17-13323.BACHIR.Strike.Motion.Formatting.RHC.KNP.docx
2
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?