McCully v. Terris
Filing
11
OPINION and ORDER Dismissing the 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
HOWARD EUGENE MCCULLY,
Petitioner,
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-13752
HONORABLE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
v.
J. A. TERRIS,
Respondent.
_________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING THE
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
On November 11, 2017, federal prisoner Howard Eugene McCully
(APetitioner@) filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
' 2241 asserting that the Bureau of Prisons erred in denying him eligibility for an
early release benefit under 18 U.S.C. ' 3621(e) upon completion of a residential drug
treatment program. Dkt. No. 1. Respondent has since advised the Court, and the
Court has confirmed, that Petitioner completed his federal sentence and was released
from federal custody on April 25, 2018. See Petitioner=s Inmate Profile, Bureau of
Prisons Inmate Locator, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/.
Article III, ' 2 of the United States Constitution requires the existence of a
case or controversy through all stages of federal judicial proceedings. United States
v. Juvenile Male, 564 U.S. 932, 936 (2011). This means that, throughout the
litigation, the petitioner Amust have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury
traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.@
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990); see also Preiser v.
Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 401 (1975). If an event occurs subsequent to the filing of a
lawsuit which deprives a court of the ability to provide meaningful relief, the case
becomes moot and is subject to dismissal. Ailor v. City of Maynardville, 368 F.3d
587, 596 (6th Cir. 2004). Similarly, a claim for habeas relief becomes moot when
the controversy between the parties is no longer alive because the party seeking relief
has obtained the relief requested. See, e.g., Picron-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773,
776 (9th Cir. 1991) (a claim is moot when the court no longer has power to grant the
requested relief); Johnson v. Riveland, 855 F.2d 1477, 1479-80 (10th Cir. 1998). A
court may raise the jurisdictional issue of mootness sua sponte. See North Carolina
v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 (1971) (AMootness is a jurisdictional question because the
Court is not empowered to decide moot questions or abstract propositions....@);
Berger v. Cuyahoga Co. Bar Ass=n, 983 F.2d 718, 721 (6th Cir. 1993) (AQuestions
of jurisdiction are fundamental matters which [a court] may review sua sponte.@).
As noted, the BOP=s Inmate Locator database indicates that Petitioner was
released from federal custody on April 25, 2018. Because Petitioner has completed
2
his sentence and has been released from custody, the Court can no longer grant him
relief on the claim contained in his petition. The present case has thus been
rendered moot and the petition must be dismissed on that basis. Accordingly, the
Court DISMISSES as moot the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This case is
closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 24, 2018
s/Gershwin A. Drain
HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
United States District Court Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys
of record on this date, October 24, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Teresa McGovern
Case Manager
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?