Robbins v. Social Security
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendation denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GREGORY ROBBINS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-13839
v.
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
On October 5, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a
report and recommendation in this action for social security benefits.
Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommends that the court grant Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment, deny Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment, and remand the case to the Commissioner under sentence four
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). No timely objections have been filed.
With respect to reports and recommendations from magistrate
judges, this court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of
the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court “may accept, reject
-1-
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the
magistrate.” Id. Having reviewed the record, the court will accept
Magistrate Judge Majzoub’s report and recommendation.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (Doc. 11) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the
Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §
405(g).
Dated: November 5, 2018
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
November 5, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?