Midgyett v. Jackson
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS MOTION TO HOLD RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT (Doc. 9)AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO MAIL A COPY OF THE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GREGORY MIDGYETT,
Petitioner,
Case No. 17-cv-13846
v.
HONORABLE AVERN COHN
SHANE JACKSON,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION
TO HOLD RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT (Doc. 9)
AND
DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO MAIL A COPY OF THE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER
This is a pro se habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254.
Petitioner Gregory Midgyett challenges his state court convictions for second-degree
murder and three weapon offenses. Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to hold
respondent Shane Jackson in default for allegedly failing to file a timely response to the
petition. See Doc. 9. Petitioner makes a similar allegation in a letter filed on April 18,
2019. See Doc. 10.
Petitioner accurately points out in his motion and letter that Respondent was
ordered to file a responsive pleading by June 4, 2018.
See Doc. 4.
Contrary to
Petitioner’s additional allegation, however, Respondent is not in default. He filed a timely
answer to the petition and the state-court materials on June 4, 2018. See Docs. 7-8. He
has also certified that he mailed a copy of his answer to Petitioner. See Doc. 7, p. 60.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to hold Respondent in default is DENIED.
Petitioner also requests a copy of the Respondent’s answer. See Doc. 11.
Although Respondent certified that a copy was mailed to Petitioner, in an abundance of
caution, the Court DIRECTS that Respondent mail another copy of the answer to
Petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6/12/2019
Detroit, Michigan
S/Avern Cohn
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?