Rayburn v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
16
OPINION and ORDER Accepting 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 , and 12 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DEANNA RAYBURN,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 17-14054
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
________________________________________/
ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEBRUARY 13,
2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [15]
Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge’s February 13, 2019 report
and recommendation (Dkt. 15.). The magistrate judge recommends denying Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment, granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment,
and affirming the Commissioner’s decision. The Court is fully advised in the premises
and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections.
“[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its
duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.
140, 149 (1985)). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation (Dkt. 15); DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment (Dkt. 10); GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 12);
and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 405(g).
SO ORDERED.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: March 7, 2019
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of
record on March 7, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Bartlett
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?