Smith v. Corizon Health Corporation et al
ORDER Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation and DENYING AS MOOT 12 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Corizon Health Corporation Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CASE NO: 18-CV-10010-DT
CORPORATION, ET AL,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28
U.S.C. '636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on March 13, 2018, the
magistrate judge recommended that this court deny as moot Defendant Corizon Health Inc’s,
[Doc #12] Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6). No objections have been
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.' 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge=s
Report and Recommendation, Defendant Corizon Health Inc’s, Motion to Dismiss [Dkt #12] is
DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 9, 2018
1The failure to object to the magistrate judge=s report releases the court from its duty to independently
review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or
pro se parties on this date, April 9, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?