Anthony v. Salisbury et al

Filing 33

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 31 Motion to Stay - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEANGELO ANTHONY, Plaintiff, No. 18-10064 v. District Judge Laurie J. Michelson Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen K. SALISBURY, ET AL., Defendants. / ORDER Plaintiff, a pro se prison inmate in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On February 14, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his complaint, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and further arguing that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim [Doc. #22]. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending final disposition of their motion for summary judgment [Doc. #31]. If Defendants’ dispositive motion is granted, the issue of discovery will be moot. Conducting discovery before that motion is decided would pose an economic burden to the parties, and not be in the interests of judicial economy. Therefore, Defendants’ motion [Doc. #31] is GRANTED, and discovery is STAYED pending final resolution of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. If that motion is denied, the Court will vacate the stay of discovery and enter a scheduling order. -1- IT IS SO ORDERED. s/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: March 31, 2019 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on March 31, 2019 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to non-registered ECF participants on March 31, 2019. s/Carolyn M. Ciesla Case Manager for the Honorable R. Steven Whalen -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?