Horton v. Bauman

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TONY HORTON, Petitioner, Case No. 18-10074 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson v. CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING CASE On January 8, 2018, Tony Horton filed a motion seeking an additional 30 days to file his petition for habeas corpus. (R. 1.) On January 17, 2018, the Court issued a deficiency order requiring Horton to first file a habeas petition and to submit either the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 21 days of the order. (R. 3.) The order advised that failure to comply could result in dismissal. (Id.) Horton subsequently submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which the Court granted on February 8, 2018. (R, 5, 6.) Horton has yet to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, however, and the time for doing so pursuant to the order has long since elapsed. It is well-established that a party must file a complaint to institute a civil action in federal court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. And in a habeas corpus proceeding, the case commences with the filing of an application for habeas corpus relief—the equivalent of a complaint in an ordinary civil case. See Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 208 (2003). Prior to the filing of a complaint, “an action has not ‘commenced’ within the meaning of the Federal Rules” and the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. See Luna v. Ford Motor Co., No. 3:06-0658, 2007 WL 837237 *2 (M.D. Tenn. March 14, 2007) (“Prior to the filing of a complaint a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction”). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case for lack of jurisdiction. This dismissal is without prejudice to Horton instituting a new civil action by filing a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court makes no determination as to the procedural or substantive merits of any such petition. SO ORDERED. s/Laurie J. Michelson LAURIE J. MICHELSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 9, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon Petitioner on this date, October 9, 2018, by first-class U.S. mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?