Rosenthal v. Social Security

Filing 4

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF to Supplement 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Mitchell E. Rosenthal--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MITCHELL E. ROSENTHAL, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:18-CV-10152 District Judge Paul D. Borman Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HIS JANUARY 12, 2018 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (DE 2) On January 12, 2018, Mitchell E. Rosenthal filed a complaint (DE 1) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s December 19, 2017 decision. On the same day, he also filed an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs (DE 2). Each of these filings was electronically filed by attorney Kenneth F. Laritz (P23711). This case has been referred to the undersigned. (DE 3.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 2), the Court concludes that it is not in a position to rule at this time. The form application (AO 240) contains answers to most questions, but is noticeably unresponsive as to question 2 regarding employment and gross pay or wages. (DE 2.) Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s application (DE 2) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental application which fully answers the questions asked, preferably with the assistance of his counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2018 s/Anthony P. Patti Anthony P. Patti UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on January 17, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?