DEMBINSKY v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
9
Order Vacating 6 Order to Show Cause, filed by ELISA MARIE DEMBINSKY., ORDER re 6 Order to Show Cause, filed by ELISA MARIE DEMBINSKY, and GRANTING 7 MOTION TO EXTEND Summons filed by ELISA MARIE DEMBINSKY,and STRIKING 8 MOTION TO EXTEND Summons/Ret of Service filing deadline, or to issue Second Summons filed by ELISA MARIE DEMBINSKY--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ELISA MARIE
DEMBINSKY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:18-cv-10532
District Judge Avern Cohn
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE (DE 6), GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF DEFENDANT (DE 7)
AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND (DE 8) AS
IMPROVIDENTLY FILED
On February 14, 2018, Plaintiff, Elise Marie Dembinsky, (who is
represented by counsel), filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a review of
a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for
social security disability benefits. (DE 1.) She named as Defendant the
Commissioner of Social Security. On February 14, 2018, the Court entered an
Order granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs,
and summons were issued for the Commissioner of Social Security on February
16, 2018 (DEs 4, 5), but proof of service was never entered onto the docket.
Accordingly, on May 18, 2018, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff
to show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to timely
serve Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (DE 6.) On
May 29, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time for filing a summons or for
the court to issue a second summons. (DE 7.) Plaintiff’s counsel explained that
her office has been short-handed and has undergone two changes to the assistants
employed in the office since the filing of this Complaint, and that during this
transition, the returned receipt from the certified mailing of the summons and
complaint has been misplaced or lost. (DE 7 at 2.) Plaintiff asks the Court to
extend the time for filing a summons to allow for proper service on Defendant.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the Court may extend the
deadline when good cause is shown. A party shows good cause by demonstrating
a ‘“reasonable justification’ for its failure to complete the requested task within the
time prescribed.” Rainey v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n, No. 11-12520, 2011 WL
4954154, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 18, 2011) (quoting Foster v. Halter, 279 F.3d 348,
357 (6th Cir. 2001)). Generally, the “normal press of business does not rise to [the
good cause] standard.” Id. at *2.
For good cause shown, the show cause order is hereby VACATED.
Further, Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to serve Defendant is
2
GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS
ORDER in which to effect service over Defendant.
Further, the motion to extend filed at DE 8 appears to be related to a
different matter (18-15036) and was improvidently filed in this matter.
Accordingly the motion to extend (DE 8) is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 4, 2018
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on June 4, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?