McCray v. Campbell

Filing 6

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LE-MART McCRAY, Petitioner, v. Case No. 2:18-cv-11058 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Respondent. _______________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Le-Mart McCray filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on April 2, 2018. Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee when he filed his petition, nor did he submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1915; Rule 3 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The Court issued an Order to Correct Deficiency on April 16, 2018, requiring Petitioner to either pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed in forma pauperis application. The order provided that if Petitioner did not submit the fee or IFP application by May 7, 2018, his case could be dismissed. The time for submitting the filing fee or required information has elapsed and Petitioner has failed to correct the deficiency. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court also denies a certificate of appealability because the disposition of the case is not reasonably debatable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(a); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). If Petitioner still desires to pursue habeas relief in this Court he may submit a new habeas petition with payment of the filing fee or an in forma pauperis application. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Victoria A. Roberts Victoria A. Roberts United States District Judge Dated: June 1, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?