Anderson v. Winn
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 2 Petitioner's MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing and 10 MOTION for Oral Arguement. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
STEVEN B. ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:18-cv-11133
HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
v.
THOMAS WINN,
Respondent.
___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ORAL
ARGUMENT
This is a habeas action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254. Petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary hearing, ECF No. 2, seeks
to make a factual record in support of his habeas claims including claims
of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Petitioner also
moves for oral argument. ECF No. 10.
In Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170, 181–82 (2011), the Supreme
Court held that where habeas claims have been decided on their merits
in state court, a federal court’s review under 28 U.S.C. section
2254(d)(1)—whether the state court determination was contrary to or an
1
unreasonable application of federal law—is limited to the record reviewed by the state courts. At this point in the proceedings, the Court
will deny without prejudice Petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary hearing until such time as it has reviewed the record and Respondent’s answer to determine whether a hearing is warranted. The Court will reconsider the request on its own motion if it determines that some or all of
Petitioner’s claims survive review under Section 2254(d). Petitioner does
not need to file another motion requesting an evidentiary hearing.
The Court will also reconsider on its own motion whether the decisional process would be aided by oral argument.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary hearing, ECF
No. 2, and motion for oral argument, ECF No. 10, are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 20, 2018 s/Terrence G. Berg
TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed,
and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on
December 20, 2018.
s/A. Chubb
Case Manager
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?