Woollard v. Corizon Health Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #61); (2) TERMINATING R. COLEMAN, SUBRINA AIKENS, MARY GRENIER, AND JANET CAMPBELL AS DEFENDANTS; (3) SUBSTITUTING RICKEY COLEMAN FOR RICHARD HARBAUGH, AND (4) DISMISSING DEFENDANT RICHARD HARBAUGH WITH PREJUDICE Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (SSch)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CORY WOOLLARD, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-11529 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. Anthony P. Patti United States Magistrate Judge CORIZON HEALTH, INC., RICHARD HARBAUGH, R. COLEMAN, SUBRINA AIKENS, MARY GRENIER, ROSILYN JINDAL JANET CAMPBELL, et. al, Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #61); (2) TERMINATING R. COLEMAN, SUBRINA AIKENS, MARY GRENIER, AND JANET CAMPBELL AS DEFENDANTS; (3) SUBSTITUTING RICKEY COLEMAN FOR RICHARD HARBAUGH, AND (4) DISMISSING DEFENDANT RICHARD HARBAUGH WITH PREJUDICE Now before the Court is the October 2, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF #61) of Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti recommending that the Court (a) terminate R. Coleman, Subrina Aikens, Mary Grenier, and Janet Campbell as Defendants; (b) substitute Rickey Coleman for Richard Harbaugh, and (c) dismiss Defendant Richard Harbaugh with prejudice. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(b), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF #61), TERMINATES R. Coleman, Subrina Aikens, Mary Grenier, and Janet Campbell as Defendants, SUBSTITUTES Rickey Coleman for Richard Harbaugh, and DISMISSES Defendant Richard Harbaugh with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2019 s/Paul D. Borman Paul D. Borman United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?