Woollard v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
Filing
62
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #61); (2) TERMINATING R. COLEMAN, SUBRINA AIKENS, MARY GRENIER, AND JANET CAMPBELL AS DEFENDANTS; (3) SUBSTITUTING RICKEY COLEMAN FOR RICHARD HARBAUGH, AND (4) DISMISSING DEFENDANT RICHARD HARBAUGH WITH PREJUDICE Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (SSch)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CORY WOOLLARD,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 18-cv-11529
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
v.
Anthony P. Patti
United States Magistrate Judge
CORIZON HEALTH, INC.,
RICHARD HARBAUGH, R.
COLEMAN, SUBRINA AIKENS,
MARY GRENIER, ROSILYN JINDAL
JANET CAMPBELL, et. al,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (ECF #61); (2) TERMINATING R. COLEMAN,
SUBRINA AIKENS, MARY GRENIER, AND JANET CAMPBELL AS
DEFENDANTS; (3) SUBSTITUTING RICKEY COLEMAN FOR RICHARD
HARBAUGH, AND (4) DISMISSING DEFENDANT RICHARD HARBAUGH
WITH PREJUDICE
Now before the Court is the October 2, 2019 Report and Recommendation
(ECF #61) of Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti recommending that the Court (a)
terminate R. Coleman, Subrina Aikens, Mary Grenier, and Janet Campbell as
Defendants; (b) substitute Rickey Coleman for Richard Harbaugh, and (c) dismiss
Defendant Richard Harbaugh with prejudice. No objections were filed to the Report
and Recommendation.
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely
objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(b), the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF #61),
TERMINATES R. Coleman, Subrina Aikens, Mary Grenier, and Janet Campbell as
Defendants, SUBSTITUTES Rickey Coleman for Richard Harbaugh, and
DISMISSES Defendant Richard Harbaugh with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 24, 2019
s/Paul D. Borman
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?