Farr v. Does
Filing
3
OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (DPer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TOMMY LEE FARR, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-11530
HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
MDOC UNKNOWN OFFICERS, et. al.,
Defendants,
/
OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING THE CIVIL RIGHTS
COMPLAINT TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Tommy Lee Farr, Jr., (“Plaintiff”), confined at the Baraga Maximum Correctional
Facility in Baraga, Michigan, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff claims that his constitutional rights were violated by the defendants while he was
incarcerated at the Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility in Muskegon Heights,
Michigan. The Court orders the Clerk of the Court to transfer the case to the United
States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
I. DISCUSSION
Plaintiff claims that he was subjected to excessive force by five corrections
officers, resulting in injuries. Plaintiff also may be claiming that the officers fabricated a
false misconduct charge against him. Plaintiff does not identify which prison he was
incarcerated at but lists the address of the five corrections officers as 2500 South Sheridan
Road in Muskegon Heights, Michigan. Plaintiff also attached several grievances to the
1
complaint indicating that the alleged incident took place at LRF. LRF is the acronym for
the Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility which is located at 2500 South Sheridan Road
in Muskegon Heights, Michigan. 1
All of the actions alleged in the complaint took place at the Brooks Correctional
Facility in Muskegon Heights, Michigan, located in the Western District of Michigan.
All of the defendants named in the complaint reside in the Western District of Michigan.
Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Baraga Maximum Correctional Facility, which is
also located in the Western District of Michigan.
Venue for a civil action typically lies is in the federal judicial district where either
all defendants reside or where the claim arose. Al-Muhaymin v. Jones, 895 F. 2d 1147,
1148 (6th Cir. 1990); 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Public officials “reside” in the county where
they serve. See O’Neill v. Battisti, 472 F. 2d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1972).
A district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where
the action might have been filed. See United States v. P.J. Dick, Inc., 79 F. Supp. 2d 803,
805-06 (E.D. Mich. 2000); 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Venue of a lawsuit may be transferred
sua sponte for the convenience of parties or witnesses. See Schultz v. Ary, 175 F. Supp. 2d
959, 964 (W.D. Mich. 2001).
The present matter must be transferred to the Western District of Michigan. All of
the “operative facts” in this case took place at the Brooks Correctional Facility, located in
1
The Court obtained this information from the Michigan Department of Corrections’ Offender Tracking
Information System (OTIS), which this Court is permitted to take judicial notice of. See e.g. Ward v.
Wolfenbarger,323 F. Supp. 2d 818, 821, n. 3 (E.D. Mich. 2004).
2
the Western District of Michigan. See Pierce v. Coughlin, 806 F. Supp. 426, 428
(S.D.N.Y. 1992). Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in the Western District of Michigan
and the defendants all reside in this district. The witnesses and files necessary to
prosecute these claims are located in the Western District of Michigan and the burden of
transporting Plaintiff to this judicial district would be significant; transfer of this action to
the Western District would be proper. See Welch v. Kelly, 882 F. Supp. 177, 180 (D.D.C.
1995).
Plaintiff failed to allege that any of the acts, events, or omissions took place in the
Eastern District of Michigan; venue for the lawsuit is not proper in this district. See Miles
v. WTMX Radio, 15 F. App’x. 213, 215 (6th Cir. 2001). Venue in this § 1983 lawsuit lies
in the Western District of Michigan, where Plaintiff alleges that the civil rights violations
occurred and the defendants reside.
II. ORDER
The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to transfer this case to the United States
District Court for the Western District of Michigan pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
S/Victoria A. Roberts
HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: May 21, 2018
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?