Clark v. City of Center Line et al

Filing 56

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion in Limine; denying 49 Motion in Limine; denying 50 Motion in Limine; granting 54 Motion to Adjourn Trial Date. Signed by Honorable Jack Zouhary. (VLun)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-11673-JZ-APP ECF No. 56, PageID.926 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Kimberly Clark, Case No. 3:18 CV 11673 ORDER RULING ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY City of Center Line, et al., Defendants. This Court held a Record Phone Conference August 17, 2022. Counsel present: Kevin Riddle for Plaintiff; Jim Tamm for Defendants. (Court reporter: Diana Ziegelhofer.) Defendant’s Motion (Doc. 54) to vacate the October trial date is granted for good cause. Trial is now tentatively scheduled for the either March 13, 2023 or March 21, 2023. Mediation will scheduled for a day during the week of October 17, 2022. Counsel shall contact this Court with a proposed mediation date. * * * This Court also addressed several pretrial filings. Plaintiff’s Daubert Motion (Doc. 50) is denied. Defendant’s Motion in Limine (Doc. 49) is denied subject to reconsideration. With respect to Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine (Doc. 48), this Court ruled as follows: A. Prior convictions: Granted in part. B. Investigation into Plaintiff’s son: Granted in part. Case 2:18-cv-11673-JZ-APP ECF No. 56, PageID.927 Filed 08/17/22 Page 2 of 2 C. Jail phone calls: Granted subject to reconsideration. Counsel shall identify which parts, if any, they wish to introduce. D. Jail Altercation: Granted. E. Officer Percha’s Employment: Granted in part. F. Nolo Contendere Plea: Granted. G. Collateral Sources: Denied as moot. H. United States Life Table: Denied as moot. See transcript for further details. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE August 17, 2022 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?