Robinson v Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation GRANTING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Donita Robinson DENYING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DONITA ROBINSON, o/b/o D.L.S.R., Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-11835 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #14); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. §405(g) FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION CONSISTENT WITH THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #12); AND (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #13) Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David R. Grand (ECF #14) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff Donita Robinson’s Motion for Summary Judgment, brought on behalf of D.L.S.R, to the extent it seeks remand (ECF #12) and deny Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #13). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(b), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand, DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDS this matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 3, 2019 s/Paul D. Borman Paul D. Borman United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?