James v. Berryhill

Filing 26

ORDER Granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EMMIT JAMES, JR., Plaintiff, Case No. 18-11911 v. Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES [24] Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 24.) Petitioner successfully represented Plaintiff in this social security appeal and asks the Court to enter an order awarding to her attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). Petitioner seeks reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,628.15. The Commissioner filed a response indicating it has no objection to awarding Petitioner a reasonable attorney fee pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) so long as the total compensation does not exceed $7,628.15. In other words, the Commissioner approves of the requested fee award so long as Petitioner refunds the previously paid EAJA fee to Plaintiff. To this end, Petitioner states in her motion the previously paid EAJA fee will be refunded to Plaintiff if the Court grants this motion for attorney’s fees. Having considered the record in this matter and being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that Petitioner’s motion should be GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 406(b) Petitioner is awarded reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,628.15. SO ORDERED. 1    s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: October 22, 2020 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on October 22, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Bartlett Case Manager 2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?