Emery v. Kory et al
ORDER Adopting 54 Report and Recommendation Granting 41 Motion for Judgment filed by Ogemaw County Sting Team and Granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Roscommon, County of, Allan Kory. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
ALLEN KORY; ROSCOMMON,
COUNTY OF; and OGEMAW
COUNTY STING TEAM,
Case No. 19-11419
Hon. George Caram Steeh
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NOS. 41, 43)
On September 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a
report and recommendation proposing that the court grant Defendants’
motions for summary judgment. No timely objections have been filed.
With respect to reports and recommendations from magistrate
judges, this court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of
the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court “may accept, reject
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the
Upon review of the report and recommendation, and having received
no objection, the court agrees with Magistrate Judge Morris’s analysis and
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Morris’s
report and recommendation (Doc. 54) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as
the order of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Allen Kory, Roscommon
County, and the Ogemaw County Sting Team’s motions for summary
judgment (ECF Nos. 41, 43) are GRANTED.
Dated: October 16, 2020
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
October 16, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also
on Neil Emery #443938, Macomb Correctional Facility
34625 26 Mile Road, New Haven, MI 48048.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?