Salami v. Eagen et al
ORDER Accepting 70 Report and Recommendation Denying 59 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Michael Mohammed Salami and Denying 60 Motion filed by Michael Mohammed Salami. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI,
TRUMBLEY, et al.,
Case No. 19-CV-11558
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 70]
Plaintiff Michael Mohammed Salami, an inmate in the custody of the
Michigan Department of Corrections (”MDOC”), filed this pro se civil rights
action on May 28, 2019. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default
(ECF No. 59) and a Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 60), which were
referred to the Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. The
Magistrate Judge recommends that both motions be denied because
defendant Trombley has not defaulted.
No timely objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.
This Court agrees with and adopts the analysis conducted and
recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Now, therefore, for the
reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, the recommendations are adopted
as orders of the court.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation
[ECF No. 70] is accepted by the Court.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for clerk’s
entry of default judgment [ECF No. 59] is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for
default judgment [ECF No. 60] is DENIED.
Dated: October 16, 2020
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
October 16, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also
on Michael Mohammed Salami #879045,
Carson City Correctional Facility, 10274 Boyer Road,
Carson City, MI 48811.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?